The automatic peer reviewing system was a helpful tool for me as a Ph.D. student. It provided a structured framework for reviewing, allowed for anonymous feedback, and provided automated feedback on the quality of my review. It improved my skills as a reviewer and I highly recommend it to the academic community.

I found the automatic peer reviewing system to be a valuable asset. It streamlined the reviewing process providing structured feedback on unfinished drafts. It also improved the accuracy and speed of the reviewing process, allowing for a more efficient use of my time. Overall, the system helped me to be a more effective reviewer/researcher.

As a student starting my research career in Computer Science, the automatic peer reviewing system was a valuable tool that helped me to understand the standards and requirements of academic publishing. It provided me with constructive feedback on my review, helping me to improve my writing and analysis skills. Highly recommended!

It helped me get more accurate feedback on my research giving me the understanding of the possible questions which can be asked by a human reviewer once submitted. The system also helped me reviewing complex papers quickly providing summary and pointer to look for. Overall, I found the system to be an invaluable tool for my work.

As an area chair of AAAI, I found the automatic peer reviewing system to be a game-changer. The system ensured a more objective and unbiased review process by allowing comparision of the human reviews with automatically generated ones. I highly recommend this system to all area chairs and journal editors.